Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Marquez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A Train^talk 06:39, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Marquez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable MMA fighter with no top tier fights. Does not meet WP:NMMA. The article was recreated after a recent PROD. PRehse (talk) 08:37, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. PRehse (talk) 08:41, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think he meets WP:NMMA as he has had one fight in Bellator, one in the UFC and is due to have his third on December 16 at UFC on Fox 26 against Marvin Vettori which makes up his 3 notable fights that he needs and there is no point deleting it as he becomes notable on December 16th anyway and people will be googling him in the run up to that event to find information out about him. Rickyc123 (talk) 08:42, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please check WP:MMATIER. Bellator is not top tier in 2016, Danna White event is a feeder promotion and as the article says his UFC debut is months away.PRehse (talk) 09:15, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:52, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Coverage is routine sports reporting and he has none of the three top tier fights required to meet WP:NMMA. At best this article was created WP:TOOSOON. Papaursa (talk) 12:21, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete coverage is routine.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:22, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete TooSoon. If someone has a redirect target I support a redirect w/o deletion. After Decemeber 16th the redirect can then be removed without having to bother with DelReview and Refunds. L3X1 (distænt write) 01:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.