Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-1 Fighting Network KHAN 2006 in Busan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete all. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:34, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- K-1 Fighting Network KHAN 2006 in Busan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
also nominating:
- K-1 Russia MAX 2006
- K-1 Rules Heavyweight Factory GP II
- K-1 MAX Netherlands 2006 The Road to Tokyo
- K-1 MAX Portugal 2006
here we go again, another useless series of results of events to qualify for other events. fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. those wanting to keep must show evidence of third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 05:39, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:GNG — CharlieEchoTango — 05:50, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. — Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 17:18, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep all These are some of the biggest and most historically significant events ever held in kickboxing. Many of them feature Grand Prixs which determine the best fighters in the region, and which allows them qualify for the World GP at the end of the year. World class and World champion fighters are featured. - Minowafan (talk) 17:28, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- please provide sources to back your claim for historically significant as per WP:PERSISTENCE. LibStar (talk) 01:01, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:10, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all Only the Busan event was even a qualifying event to advance to the next round. No indication of anything besides routine sports coverage. They lack notability and independent sources. Papaursa (talk) 17:03, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.