Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-1 World Grand Prix 2001 in Melbourne

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to List of K-1 events--Ymblanter (talk) 11:17, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

K-1 World Grand Prix 2001 in Melbourne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:EVENT. Just a sports event result listing. And this was a qualifying event for another event. LibStar (talk) 10:48, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 15:15, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:

K-1 World Grand Prix 2003 Preliminary UK (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
K-1 World Grand Prix 2002 in Las Vegas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)Peter Rehse (talk) 17:58, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
These events are also not notable and should be included in my delete vote above. The UK winner qualified to be an alternate at a qualifying event for qualifying event. The Las Vegas event was a qualifying event for a qualifying event, though it had a strong list of fighters. Papaursa (talk) 04:08, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 07:25, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.