Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-1 World Grand Prix 2003 in Melbourne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:37, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

K-1 World Grand Prix 2003 in Melbourne

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

another non notable kickboxing event. nothing in gnews, nothing in major Australian search engine trove [1], and nothing in major Australian news website [2]. fails WP:GNG. it seems the Australian media forgot to cover this event. LibStar (talk) 15:13, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 16:38, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:36, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep One of many regional GPs was held at this event, which featured a number of notable fighters. -- WölffReik (talk) 14:22, 20 July 2011

having notable fighters is not a reason for keeping. Not one reliable Australian media source even covered this event. LibStar (talk) 13:26, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a surprisingly large number of non-notable fighters for a K-1 regional GP. More importantly, there's a lack of notability claims and independent sources. Astudent0 (talk) 17:47, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No sourcing at all. Since this happened almost 8 years ago, I'm not seeing the resonance in media necessary to cite this page with multiple independent sources which aren't routine sports news. BusterD (talk) 20:41, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.