Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kang Ji Won

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:26, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kang Ji Won

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is a mixed martial arts fighter. Subject fails WP:NMMA for not having at least 3 fights under top tier promotion and subject also fails GNG for the fight info is merely routine report HeinzMaster (talk) 01:36, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. HeinzMaster (talk) 01:36, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. HeinzMaster (talk) 01:36, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. HeinzMaster (talk) 01:36, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:38, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Another MMA fighter who lacks significant independent coverage and therefore fails to meet WP:GNG. With no top tier fights and a fightmatrix ranking of #81 he also fails to meet any criteria of WP:NMMA. Papaursa (talk) 20:02, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per nom and Papaursa. Fails GNG and NMMA. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:32, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. I did a Newspapers.com search and couldn't find anything beyond routine coverage. SPF121188 ^{(tell me!)} ^(contribs) 15:35, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails GNG and NMMA. Cassiopeia talk 03:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.