Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kateda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:04, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kateda

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources found to support notability. Janggeom (talk) 15:46, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. — Janggeom (talk) 15:50, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:MANOTE. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 16:01, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Subject appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:MANOTE while article seems to fail WP:V, and WP:NPOV. Can't find independent sources that show notability. Astudent0 (talk) 16:25, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Fails WP:MANOTE. moɳo 19:01, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced article with unsubstantiated claims, such as being "at least 3,000 years old, perhaps even 10,000". I found nothing to indicate notability when I searched. Papaursa (talk) 02:52, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.