Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith McVey
Tools
Actions
Allgemein
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keith McVey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not to belittle the man but this does not come even close to meeting the requirements of WP:BIO. The article is constructed from a single human interest news story. I see no conceivable way in which this can come close to being of encyclopedic interest. Pichpich (talk) 21:56, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable, but fair play to the guy IJA (talk) 22:18, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:BIO as well as WP:NOT#NEWS, but my hats off to him. Battleaxe9872 Talk 15:08, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A brave and honorable man, to be sure, but fails WP:BIO. Eddie.willers (talk) 00:43, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, reluctantly, per above comments. GregJackP Boomer! 16:43, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - he did save three kids, but that is one event in a man's life. What else did he do? Bearian (talk) 21:15, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.