Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Kobold
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 19:28, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Kelly Kobold (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Female MMA fighter with no appearances for a top tier MMA organization, thus failing WP:NMMA. Playing in the Lingerie Football League doesn't confer notability either. In fact, she's not even listed on the roster given in the article. Papaursa (talk) 02:48, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Papaursa (talk) 02:48, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 03:36, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 03:36, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep the google news search above turns up a large number of articles about the subject matter. While she may not pass the specifics of WP:NMMA, she clearly passes the general notability guideline.--Paul McDonald (talk) 04:02, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- All I see is WP:ROUTINE sports coverage--fight results and announcements, no significant coverage. Papaursa (talk) 19:14, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a far cry from basic statistics and scores. There's a large amount of coverage throughout--there's nothing routine about that.--Paul McDonald (talk) 21:17, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- All I see is WP:ROUTINE sports coverage--fight results and announcements, no significant coverage. Papaursa (talk) 19:14, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not enough top-tier fights to pass WP:NMMA. She got media coverage for fighting Gina Carano, but that's about it. Not enough to pass WP:GNG. Luchuslu (talk) 21:54, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Paul McDonald (talk) 00:52, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't meet WP:NMMA since she doesn't have any top tier fights. Doesn't meet WP:GNG since the coverage appears to be routine sports coverage--just fight summaries, announcements, or results. I didn't find anything that meets WP:N--"significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." 204.126.132.231 (talk) 15:44, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's clear she doesn't meet WP:NMMA. I also agree with the above comments that say she doesn't meet WP:GNG because her coverage is just typical sports reporting. Mdtemp (talk) 15:29, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.