Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Haley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 15:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Haley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable MMA fighter - does not come close to meeting WP:MMANOT. According to Shedog (but not the article) only three professional fights (one a loss), none-top tier. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:52, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:52, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 11:12, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Sources seem good enough — Preceding unsigned comment added by Perfect Orange Sphere (talk • contribs) 13:04, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Which of these sources do you think show significant independent and non-routine coverage?Mdtemp (talk) 14:07, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NMMA and WP:GNG. He has only 3 fights and none of them are top tier. Coverage is routine. Jakejr (talk) 04:31, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:40, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He doesn't meet WP:NMMA and none of the sources provide the significant independent reliable sourcing required to meet WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 21:03, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I think previous delete voters nailed it.Mdtemp (talk) 14:07, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.