Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khayal Dzhaniev

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ceradon (talk • edits) 03:11, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Khayal Dzhaniev

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable kickboxer - does not meet WP:KICK or WP:GNG. The contested PROD was for the same reason. Peter Rehse (talk) 12:05, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 12:05, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per significant coverage.[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] [8], [9] Nominator is kindly reminded to search for native language sources WP:BEFORE nominating AfD. —Мандичка^YO 😜 14:12, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As best I can tell these articles are all either announcements of upcoming fights or fight results, making the coverage routine and insufficient to meet WP:GNG. Thank you for providing native spellings, but using them I still didn't find what I believe is significant independent coverage. Papaursa (talk) 16:15, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:05, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:05, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Definitely doesn't meet the notability criteria for kickboxers at WP:KICK. As I said above, the references given and my own search didn't find the coverage I believe is necessary to meet WP:GNG. Admittedly, I had to rely on computer translations so I will reconsider my vote if evidence can be provided to show he does have significant non-routine coverage. Papaursa (talk) 16:15, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮JAaron95 ^Talk 13:38, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable kickboxer and routine sports coverage doesn't meet WP:GNG. Mdtemp (talk) 15:57, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom, Papaursa, and Mdtemp. He exists, he's a kickboxer, but he doesn't meet notability requirements. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:19, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.