Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimball–Snow–Woolley family
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde (talk) 17:40, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Kimball–Snow–Woolley family[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kimball–Snow–Woolley family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Source searches are providing no coverage in independent, reliable sources for this family. As such, the topic fails WP:V and WP:N. North America1000 20:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:44, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:45, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Some of the individuals may well be notable, but no evidence has been advanced for why they are notable as a family. Further, the article says nothing about them as a family, it is just a collection of brief bios. It's almost all WP:NOTGENEALOGY material. SpinningSpark 17:28, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Sourcing and notability issues aside, the article is a clear violation of policy (WP:NOTGENEALOGY). Bakazaka (talk) 23:14, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.