Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kin tae kwon do

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 12:47, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kin tae kwon do

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Individual martial arts school with no significant independent coverage. Notability is not obtained from who the school's instructors' instructors were, nor generic martial arts claims. Nothing to show this meets WP:MANOTE or WP:GNG. Seems like the article's purpose was to promote the school and that's not what WP is for.Mdtemp (talk) 15:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 15:27, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nominator - this is a single school advert. Take out the general statements about taekwondo and their references and there is not much there.Peter Rehse (talk) 15:27, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as not notable outside possibly a local area and then as a business; agree that it reads like a promotion piece. Kierzek (talk) 19:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly fails WP:GNG. The secondary sources provided are not suitable. Steven Walling • talk 06:51, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 08:53, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revise More reliable sources is needed.
Delete Article is about a single non-notable school. Neither WP:GNG or WP:MANOTE are met. Papaursa (talk) 23:20, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non notable school. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 08:23, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.