Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiyoshi Arakaki
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 22:59, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Kiyoshi Arakaki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No independent evidence he's a notable martial artist. My search found no significant independent coverage and the article's sources are simply a list of his books. He fails both WP:GNG and WP:MANOTE. He doesn't inherit notability from his instructors, high rank doesn't show notability, and creating your own style doesn't show notability. Article was apparently created by a student of his style. Nothing in the article shows he meets any notability criteria.Mdtemp (talk) 16:53, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 17:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 17:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable martial artist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:48, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The only real claim of notability appears to be that he has authored some karate books, but I see nothing to show he meets WP:AUTHOR. The references consist of a list of his books, which are certainly not independent of him, and fail to show he meets WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 00:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:19, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.