Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knights and Lords Trading LLC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:59, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Knights and Lords Trading LLC

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Knights and Lords Trading LLC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotionally sounding article about a local company lacking depth of coverage and reliable independent sources. Sourcing appears largely based on promo pieces/advertorials. Editing history of the author implies COI. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:47, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:47, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 23:01, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

• Delete - promotional, advert, extremely poor writing style, "bespoke" article. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 21:48, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

BTW, the article has been moved to Knights and Lords Tailoring, but the above still applies. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 21:50, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

• Delete Poor sources again. Highly promotional. scope_creep (talk) 23:20, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.