Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LIFE (church)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
LIFE (church)[edit]
- LIFE (church) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional page in church. No independent references after three years. Cannot find anything independent in google (but name makes this very hard). If a few independent refs can be found, but not enough to meet WP:GNG, merge to a note in the related Hillsong Church article. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:13, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:37, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:37, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:37, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per nom. Looks entirely self-promotional. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 20:49, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per DerbyCountyinNZ. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 00:11, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No independent sources, needs considerable work. NealeFamily (talk) 04:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.