Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Langdon Morris (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Langdon Morris

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted in 2011 (but not G4 as there are added publications post-2011). Subject has published quite a few books, all be it many via CreateSpace and the like, and some papers. However - these do not seem to pass WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR. BEFORE doesn't show he passes GNG. Article itself is quite promotional, and its creation was somewhat "fishy" (rejected at AfC a few times, a year later a different user comes along and mainspaces it) Icewhiz (talk) 15:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 01:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 01:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 01:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 01:51, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject fails WP:AUTHOR. True, the subject is a prolific author, but has not created the significant works needed for inclusion as laid down by the our points in WP:AUTHOR.--SamHolt6 (talk) 20:02, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Another article that brings to mind Wikipedia is not Linkedin.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:19, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 08:34, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.