Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurence Richardson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This is without prejudice to an editor creating a redirect to List of Family Affairs characters, which does not require consensus. Stifle (talk) 09:14, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Laurence Richardson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actor. The vast majority of his appearances are uncredited, and all other roles appear minor. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia needs to stop being an IMDb mirror. This page has existed for 12 years, that is scary. It is this sort of letting no qualitry articles last that is moving us very quickly towards having 1 million articles on living people.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:03, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ Delete or Redirect: Apart from the subject's 26-episode stint in Family Affairs, I can't see any other roles that would go towards WP:NACTOR. I am also struggling to find sources. Dflaw4 (talk) 09:38, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Perhaps a "redirect" to List of Family Affairs characters might work, too. Dflaw4 (talk) 15:15, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Family Affairs characters as his only prominent role, does not pass WP:NACTOR at this stage, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 19:51, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Normally I'd advocate the redirect, but Richardson's character isn't mentioned at all in his own article or the proposed redirects. It's a completely context-less redirect. bibliomaniac 1 5 01:49, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per @John Pack Lambert. That the word "uncredited" appears 35 times for individual roles is as clear a failure of WP:NACTOR as you can get. Was created in 2008 as the only ever edit of a WP:SPA. Nothing worth redirecting, and I would add, given the enormous number of uncredited roles and lack of any sources substantiating those career claims, this article seems to be a WP:BLP violation. Newshunter12 (talk) 02:47, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.