Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence Ajayi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:50, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence Ajayi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The author removed the proposed deletion template so here we are at AfD. I haven't found any third-party reliable sources to confirm this individual's notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:40, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Promotional article of a non-notable subject. There doesn't seem to be any third party reliable sources covering the person.--SGCM (talk) 04:56, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:50, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:50, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only sources available are social media sites, the subject's own website and a self-published book. Nothing that would pass the bar for "reliable", hence nothing that would pass the basic notability criteria. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:51, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:53, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A promotional article of a subject with no independent reliable sources. --Artene50 (talk) 04:59, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.