Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Miles
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 02:19, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Lee Miles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable musician. Seemingly part of a group of self-promotors including Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg W. Locke CalendarWatcher (talk) 03:07, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 05:43, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 05:43, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 06:29, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence in the article or on Google News that the topic meets WP:GNG or WP:BAND. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 10:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Something close to Greg W. Locke, so I'm going to require proper RSes and discount those as not-independent. As of right now, it doesn't seem to meet BAND or GNG. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:11, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.