Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Imamura

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus DGG ( talk ) 23:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Leo Imamura (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article of no clear notability. Does not meet WP:MANOTE or WP:GNG PRehse (talk) 11:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:04, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:04, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete I don't see the significant independent coverage required to meet the WP:GNG. Nothing mentioned in the article seems to meet any of the notability criteria for martial artists.Sandals1 (talk) 12:09, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Agree with the previous comments. Subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:MANOTE. Coverage is not significant and independent and there is no evidence of martial arts notability. Rank alone is never considered sufficient to support a claim of martial arts notability. I believe the article on his student, Julio Camacho, has similar problems. Papaursa (talk) 20:07, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.