Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Li Gar Kao
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 18:34, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Li Gar Kao (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As noted in its header, this article has a lot of problems. Primarily, it's an unsourced article that fails to show this martial art has any notability. Papaursa (talk) 20:55, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Papaursa (talk) 20:55, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Even the Wiki links are to articles that don't exist and themselves don't pull up much in the way of hits. There is so little real information in the article that it borders on nonsense.Peter Rehse (talk) 00:19, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 23:47, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article's list of issues says it all--no notability, no sources, original research, etc. Mdtemp (talk) 16:00, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.