Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pakistani Nobel laureates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:00, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of Pakistani Nobel laureates

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article represents such things already existing in List of Nobel laureates by country. And just two entries exist here, with two americans with Indian included here. This article should be redirected to List of Nobel laureates by country মাখামাখি (talk) 11:50, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The nomination gives no policy based reason for why this list article should be deleted, but argues it should be redirected to List of Nobel laureates by country. This is a solution that could have been proposed prior to coming to AFD by boldly blanking and redirecting per policy, but it was not. It can still be sought through reaching consensus on the article talk page. (This AFD page needs proper formatting and transclution in todays log, please see WP:AFDHOW2.) Sam Sailor 18:39, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and close. This is a revenge nomination after a set of articles created by the nom were put up for AfD. Also, the nom has now been blocked for this very type of disruption. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:01, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 09:54, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 09:54, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 09:54, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Took a quick look at the article. Appears to me it's worth keeping. It has 3 existing references from 2015, also 1 reference from Washington post newspaper.Ngrewal1 (talk) 01:11, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly valid, and referenced list and contained notable people with defined inclusion criteria. Notewirthy is, this is clear revenge nomination after the nominator's articles are AfD'ed. –Ammarpad (talk) 08:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural Keep If redirection is an acceptable option for the nominator, then the nominator should not have brought the article to AfD in the first place. (Also, it's a perfectly acceptable topic for a list anyway.) XOR'easter (talk) 21:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep This is — and the others are — eminently notable and definitively established by WP:RS. There are a very limited number of potential lists like these (limited, albeit growing, number of countries and winners) and are absolutely bringing readers. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As a procedural note, the nominator is currently blocked and thus unable to participate. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural Keep nom by a blocked user. samee ^talk 17:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.