Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Rookie of the Year awards by team
Tools
Actions
Allgemein
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:17, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- List of Rookie of the Year awards by team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completely unnecessary. Data is already at Major League Baseball Rookie of the Year award, just not set off in a table like this (could easily be, but not really useful). Does not warrant own article. Staxringold talkcontribs 00:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree. The table at Major League Baseball Rookie of the Year award is sufficient. It is not useful to separate. Jujutacular talkcontribs 00:45, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: unintentional content fork ... can easily be summarized as a smaller table in Major League Baseball Rookie of the Year award, or not. LonelyBeacon (talk) 03:04, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The teams with the most Rookie of the Year winners are already listed in Major League Baseball Rookie of the Year award, and that's really all that's worth mentioning. This article isn't really useful at all. Moreover, it's not even correct. The Tampa Bay Rays have one RoY award winner: Evan Longoria won in 2008. Makeemlighter (talk) 18:43, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. —Rlendog (talk) 16:05, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete redundant. Or you could redirect it there. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 01:57, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.