Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of games using hardware transform and lighting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 10:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of games using hardware transform and lighting

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too many games require hardware transform and lighting, thus, this list is hopelessly incomplete; since most relevant CPUs (including mobile CPUs) have built-in support for hardware transform and lighting, this is no longer a distinct feature. Martin Kraus (talk) 09:19, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Martin Kraus (talk) 09:27, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:GAMECRUFT. Sergecross73 msg me 09:42, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No merit be page in Wikipedia mainspace as per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:36, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:57, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This was notable when relatively few games fell into the category, and therefore it is probably still notable on the basis of "once notable, always notanle". Eastmain (talk • contribs) 12:57, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nominator and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. This game requirement is most definitely not a notable attribute. Ajf773 (talk) 18:03, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a non-notable list of semi-WP:GAMECRUFT failing WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS, that focus on the list as a group rather than individual entries or the topic itself. Does not meet WP:LISTN as a stand-alone list. Does not warrant a WP:CFORK from the parent article, because it would simply appear as an unsourced example list. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 08:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:GAMECRUFT, WP:GNG, WP:VG/RS, WP:LISTN, and WP:CFORK. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 08:57, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Is this page really necessary for Wikipedia because I certainly don't think it should be. HawkAussie (talk) 05:54, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.