Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of intercity bus stops in South Dakota

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of intercity bus stops in South Dakota

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NLIST. Also nominating the sister article List of intercity bus stops in North Dakota for the same reason. I found mostly maps of the stops themselves, though I fail to see how the bus stops in a list format provide notability. Conyo14 (talk) 05:37, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation, Lists, North Dakota, and South Dakota. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:21, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conyo14, this AFD is not formatted as a bundled nomination so the closure will only affect the South Dakota article. You can't just mention another article in your nomination statement and have it be included. Please read over the WP:AFD instructions for nominating multiple articles and re-format your nomination if you want it to also be considered. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:57, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the only thing not completed correctly was the "la|related article 1". That has been rectified. Conyo14 (talk) 04:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Conyo14, you're good. By the way, I see hundreds of AFDs and I'd say 75% of bundled nominations from 1st time nominators are incorrect. It's not complicated once you know what to do but it seems to stump even experienced editors. Maybe we need to improve the instructions. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some closers might not even notice, so it's fair. Conyo14 (talk) 08:14, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the formatting isn't for the closer's benefit but the tool we rely heavily on, XFDcloser, needs this formatting to recognize what articles the AFD covers. It's invaluable to us but it is very inflexible. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both per WP:NOTCATALOG and nom. -1ctinus📝🗨 14:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.