Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of movies broadcast by Nickelodeon
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 04:00, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- List of movies broadcast by Nickelodeon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
WP:NOT Indiscriminiate information, list of loosely associated topics. As the title says, a list of every film ever broadcast by Nickelodeon. Who cares if Nickelodeon showed Ferris Bueller's Day Off last September anyway? Saikokira 03:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete, pure listcruft. Nothing but a list of loosely associated topics. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 03:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as trivia, listcruft, and loosely-associated list. Useight 04:15, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete origional reserarch--SefringleTalk 04:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hypersonic delete Why are we even debating this obviously non-encyclopedic entry? Some admin please WP:SNOWBALL this listcrufty aberration.--Cerejota 06:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- WTF? recommend deletion. Guroadrunner 08:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete blatant listcruft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DraxusD (talk • contribs)
- Delete — Not appropriate for Wikipedia. Cedars 09:53, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom & comments.--Targeman 12:39, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Mowsbury 12:55, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Malcolmxl5 14:18, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete per nom. WP:SNOW
- Delete This is listcruft and possibly original research. It could be considered unencyclopedic, too. --SunStar Net talk 21:53, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, to call it cruft is nothing short of an understatement. Resolute 00:17, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - just chiming in to say, yeah, snow this. --Haemo 00:21, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - It always brings tears to my eyes when the WikiCabal works :D--Cerejota 00:42, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Author may not have been aware that Ferris Bueller was not a made-for-TV film. Although I'm no fan of the kid-stuff that permeates Wikipedia, like the 400 articles for Buffy and every other TV series, the movies made specifically by and for the Nickelodeon network are notable. Obviously, a feature-length film is going to be different than a ten minute episode of a TV show. I won't say "strong keep" because I have a feeling this exists elsewhere on Wikipedia. If not, then "strong keep". Each film inevitably becomes a DVD and ends up in the stream of commerce. As a list of full length films, this is more worthwhile than an episode guide to a TV series. Mandsford 02:18, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Slime it Cruftacious in the extreme. If it wasn't snowing before, it definitely is now. Blueboy96 20:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, what fun it is to ride in a one-horse open sleigh... --Targeman 20:59, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this before someone starts singing Oh the weather outside is frightful.... Bearian 21:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- ...but the fire is so delightful, and since we've no place to go, let it snow, let it... ahem *cough* --Targeman 21:59, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteSpeedy Delete To long of a list. Who's up for a SNOWBALL fight? -FrogTape 16:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Speedy delete and ban the user responsible for creating the article in the first place. Burntsauce 18:31, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Come on, why ban? Why not condemn the user to be named in WP:LISTCRUFT as an example of what not to do? ;).--Cerejota 00:12, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, first condemn them to LISTCRUFT... AND THEN BAN! MUAHAHAHAHAHA! -FrogTape 00:49, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Come on, why ban? Why not condemn the user to be named in WP:LISTCRUFT as an example of what not to do? ;).--Cerejota 00:12, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Full use of rights under WP:CENSOR warning: I am a sick man, all this talk brought to mind:Snowballing (sexual practice)... nasty... :P--Cerejota 00:12, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- @Cerejota: Holy fucking shit man, I was eating!!! X( --Targeman 00:17, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Can we hurry up anbd close this debate soon? FrogTape 00:51, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, notable, coherent as a topic. Everyking 02:43, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.