Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lithonia (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ Broc (talk) 20:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lithonia (song)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Bando Stone & the New World was undone, hence the AfD. The song does not fulfill (yet?) WP:NSONG, I propose a Redirect to the album Broc (talk) 12:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and United States of America. Broc (talk) 12:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I originally redirected it for the same reason.— Moriwen (talk) 20:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Oppose. Both the song and album have been receiving a lot of coverage the past two days [(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)], as well as some earlier coverage such as (12). They simply just need to be incorporated into Wikipedia as only three of these sources appear in either article, with both having at max five sources with minimal text. Most record charting groups close their tracking week in a couple days anyways, so it's bound to chart before a full AfD can pass. Koopastar (talk) 05:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per the previous voter, there are easily enough sources to indicate that the song is getting reliable coverage in its own right, and not just as a teaser for the upcoming album. Those were available at the time of the AfD and would have been noticed via a WP:BEFORE search. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 12:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as this song has received significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources. I agree with the above discussion about it. Aoba47 (talk) 14:37, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Moving to Speedy keep and withdrawing my nomination. Other users have shown sufficient coverage for the topic to fulfill notability requirements. Broc (talk) 20:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.