Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lito Pimentel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – bradv🍁 23:22, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lito Pimentel

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Im requesting for someone to nominate afd on this articles on Andre Tiangco Zaijian Jaranilla Victor Basa Lito Pimentel John Medina (actor)‎, as they contain only a single sources and far to be notable. 70.113.36.219 (talk) 11:12, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination on behalf of IP. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles nominated by the same IP:

--Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:33, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:30, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: as not notable. This article as already existed since 2013 (tagged since 2014) against clear policies and guidelines. It is a single sourced BLP that uses a derogatory source and a majority of the content is improperly sourced through the "External links" section and IMDb. I think it should have long been speedy deleted. -- Otr500 (talk) 16:31, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable according to Otr500's very good point about BLP standards. --Lockley (talk) 20:05, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: He was part of an 80s noontime show. Other than that, he has bagged character roles throughout his career. That's also based on search results. The article is good enough to pass WP:NACTOR. My vote stands. ~~I won't reply any further.~~ ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 10:27, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete one source is not enough to establish notability, and when it relates to a criminal accusation even more so. IMDb counts for absolutely nothing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:32, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Sources have been added in the article recently. He was charged with frustrated parricide after allegedly stabbing his wife. It was also covered here as well. He's also talked about in this article, where he was part of the late Alfie Lorenzo's talent group Liberty Boys, he starred in various movies & TV series, had his stint in comedy, and won as Best Supporting Actor in Gawad Urian for his role in Kapag Napagod Ang Puso. Other sources in the article talk about his roles in various TV shows. I believe those reliable sources are good enough for the article to pass WP:NACTOR. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 01:39, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per WP:HEY as since the nomination multiple references to significant coverage in a number of reliable sources have been added to the article which show that the actor passes WP:NACTOR as well as WP:GNG so that deletion is no longer necessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:42, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:20, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:27, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm late to this, and I admit if I'd seen it in the condition it was when it was nominated, I probably would have been minded to delete. But that notwithstanding, there's been a job of work done since , and the article now demonstrates its notability through its extensive sourcing, in spades. ——Serial^# 16:49, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY. — Toughpigs (talk) 01:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.