Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lohan yoga

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lohan yoga

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Yoga variation. This was declined several times in Draft, before being copy pasted over, mainly for lack of references. Also Lohan Yoga was speedied as promo but I have no idea how this content differs. The only non-Primary references are about concepts not the subject itself. There does not seem to be a level of coverage to back up any claims of notability. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:45, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 14:46, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Outside of this youtube link, I have found nothing notable. [1] 173.52.99.208 (talk) 04:36, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete copy of thrice declined draft done by SPA/Sock of original. Appears as an unreliably sourced advert and promotion for the person initiating a revival.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 16:45, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well I don't think you can call it a revival. It appears to be an amalgamation of two different things with a synthetic history.Peter Rehse (talk) 20:19, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

True, was basing it on the second paragraph of the lead.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 18:26, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete My search did not find the significant independent coverage to show this is notable. None of the article's references support the claim of meeting WP:GNG, as many are not really about the topic but consist of general information on broader topics. Papaursa (talk) 01:50, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Many of the article's problems had been brought up at Lohan yoga and Draft:Lohan Yoga of which the latter had been declined by Robert McClenon. It does not meet our criteria for WP:SIGCOV and WP:BEFORE search does not reveal much. Mkdw ^talk 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there's still nothing for its own convincing substantial notability. SwisterTwister talk 00:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.