Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loiter Squad
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 17:18, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Loiter Squad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Insufficient notability and verifiable reliable sources. Contested PROD. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 03:41, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Insufficient notability, yet it airs on a top-rated cable network? Just because you haven't heard of something doesn't mean it isn't notable.--76.106.255.89 (talk) 04:02, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
unfortantly this is a tv show its on adult swim which is part of the cartoon network after 9pm pst lineup, however it only continues showing racial terms as if its funny or appropriate, its a black version of jackass meets sketch comedy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.8.251.26 (talk) 06:34, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think the evidence shown here is more than enough for this to be removed from the afd list.Gyopi NG (talk) 04:01, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Lots of reliable sources out there stating that this TV show exists. Have a search on Google News. Coolug (talk) 09:56, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Per Entertainment Weekly, Hollywood Reporter, Rolling Stone, Pitchfork, and more. The nominator should have searched for sources first. SL93 (talk) 20:24, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Plenty of sources exist, such as the ones identified above by SL93, and others like [1][2][3][4][5]. Gongshow Talk 21:45, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.