Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mai Mari da Ashtan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Based on the course of the discussion, this article now has evidence of meeting GNG Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:53, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mai Mari da Ashtan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fringy (it even admits to this). Slatersteven (talk) 11:15, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:25, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:26, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:26, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per [1] and WP:GNG. However, there may be other spellings. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:28, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, sources to look at. Don't rush it. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:10, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails as per nom. Barca (talk) 13:13, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- While I do not accept the claims for the monument in the article, pilgrimage is an important feature of Sufi Islam and Hinduism, so that this article is wholly credible. If there are problems over the transliteration of Urdu or Hindi, the answer is redirects from the variant spellings. There certainly is a Muslim sect that believes Jesus went to India and died there. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:27, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails as per Slatersteven (talk) --SalmanZ (talk) 21:31, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- the article is legitimate although I agree needs to be expanded upon. To maintain impartiality we need these articles to remain active regardless of if they are considered controversial.Medz (talk) 22:46, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a number of the sources added to the article such as the Asia Times and books devoted to the subject seem to pass WP:GNG, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:37, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "fringy" is an inappropriate slur on faith. Even atheists, if they are objective, should be able to acknowledge that pilgrimage sites are often notable. This one quite obviously is.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:21, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.