Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manjula Peiris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. slakr^\ talk / 11:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Manjula Peiris

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of significance Itsalleasy (talk) 02:57, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:33, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete There is some secondary source coverage and mention of awards. But the sources seem dicey to me and the awards definitely do not ring my "significant" bell. Knowledgekid87 and I were discussing this article earlier and we talked about merging it into List of astrologers. But that list is only for those with their own wiki articles. As originally written I think it was clearly a promo article but KK87 redacted most of that. I think I would have gone with a PROD though before sending it here. -Ad Orientem (talk) 05:35, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:23, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only fringe awards, no significant coverage in reliable sources, no sign of why he might be notable Wikipedia:FRINGE#Notability. IRWolfie- (talk) 18:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.