Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marshall Gagne
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Marshall Gagne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable martial artist since rank does not show notability on WP. Fails WP:GNG and WP:MANOTE. Nothing shows he's notable as a martial artist and the only significant independent coverage is an interview in the local (Tryon, NC) newspaper.Mdtemp (talk) 15:12, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 15:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete My search did not find the sources needed to show WP:GNG is met and there is no supporting evidence that he meets the martial arts notability criteria mentioned at WP:MANOTE. Papaursa (talk) 00:50, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete' As per above.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:51, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as nothing suggesting better notability improvements. SwisterTwister talk 05:55, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. The only independent coverage seems to be in "the world's smallest daily newspaper". Nowhere near enough to justify an article. --Michig (talk) 06:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.