Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathias Gallo Cassarino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:22, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mathias Gallo Cassarino

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not-notable - self promotional. Amateur level. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:22, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:22, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:13, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:13, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He's listed as an international champion at [1]. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 20:08, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:21, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It's not clear what the above referenced international championship is. However, the same site does show him ranked #10 in the world and that appears enough to meet WP:KICK.Mdtemp (talk) 15:22, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:05, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment International Champ in this context appears to mean the best non-Thai that competed. The competitions all appear to be amateur in non-major promotions. Not impressed.Peter Rehse (talk) 12:27, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The WBC is professional, not amateur. The IFMA is amateur.204.126.132.231 (talk) 19:44, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep I think his top ten WBC ranking is sufficient, barely, to show notability--especially since there is other coverage of him. I would definitely say he's a professional, not an amateur. Papaursa (talk) 19:27, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.