Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Secor
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 10:40, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Matt Secor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
MMA fighter who has one top tier fight and is not currently fighting for a top tier organization. Fails WP:NMMA and GNG since coverage is routine sports reporting.Mdtemp (talk) 16:56, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 17:34, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete As per nominator. The single top tier fight was a loss and his total number of professional fights is also very low. Looks like he almost got his chance for a second top tier fight but even if that happens it would still be too soon.Peter Rehse (talk) 17:34, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Fails to meet WP:NMMA with only one top tier fight (a loss in 2012) and all of the coverage is routine sports reporting. Papaursa (talk) 02:35, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable MMA fighter. One top tier fight doesn't make him notable. Jakejr (talk) 04:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.