Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mean Red Spiders (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per the sources found by DoubleBlue establishing that the article meet the [[WP:MUSIC|relevant notability guideline. Please add the relevant information to the article. Davewild (talk) 12:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mean Red Spiders (2nd nomination)

came across article since it's mentioned on this WP page. Still seems to be a mess two years after last nomination. Band doesn't appear to meet a single Wikipedia:Notability (music) requirement. Last nomination someone mentioned lots of Google hits, but it has since been mentioned in the article that there are or were three other bands by the same name so Google hits is even more irrelevant than usual. Most of the references are myspace pages. Only possibly reliable link is to "new music canada" website, but that seems to list thousands of small local bands so can't be a claim to notability. Possible vanity/conflict issues, too since a major editor has been User:Dashumphreys, while the article mentions "Co-founding member David Humphreys". GDallimore (Talk) 11:10, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, and a weak one at that. Meets WP:MUSIC#C5, unless of course if someone nominates Teenage USA Recordings and all their associated bands for notability too. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 11:27, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Even if Teenage USA Recordings are notable enough to warrant an article, that doesn't make them a "major label" or "one of the more important indie labels". Their article fails to assert either of these or any of the other requirements for C5. GDallimore (Talk) 12:32, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 12:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there is no significant coverage in reliable third party sources. —Snthdiueoa (talk|contribs) 21:06, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- DoubleBlue (Talk) 19:54, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Esradekan, this meets WP:MUSIC#C5 as stated above. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 20:46, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It really is just spam. Wikipedia isn't for things made up. GreenJoe 20:50, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:MUSIC several times. Subject of multiple non-trivial published works, Charted hit on any national music chart, Has received non-trivial coverage in a reliable source of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour, Has released two or more albums on one of the more important indie labels, + on rotation on CBC Radio 3. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] DoubleBlue (Talk) 21:00, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per DoubleBlue. Bearcat (talk) 02:35, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.