Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mel Bartels (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:05, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mel Bartels

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The previous Afd failed because nobody bothered to lvote, but the rationale remains the same: having an asteroid named after you doesn't make you notable. Fails GNG and BIO. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 11:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 11:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 11:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 11:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 11:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 11:15, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no coverage in reliable sources. Insufficient material to ground a reliable article in. Antrocent (♫♬) 19:08, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is no evidence that the subject of this article meets notability criteria (WP:BIO). Deli nk (talk) 18:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.