Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Moreno (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:27, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Moreno

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to be notable. He doesn't appear to meet any of the criteria listed at WP:MANOTE. Article has been tagged for notability since May 2009 and has been speedily deleted 4 times. Its previous AfD generated only 2 votes--1 for AfD and 1 for keep. Article appears to have a lot of sources, but they're not independent and some of them are either dead links or don't mention him at all. Papaursa (talk) 00:36, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —Papaursa (talk) 00:36, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I would consider myself more educated on mixed martial artists than regular martial artists. But I see nothing in the article or in a Google search or in the article's contents that suggests this guy is notable. --TreyGeek (talk) 00:49, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of reliable sources. Dwanyewest (talk) 01:15, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Lack of coverage in WP:RS to show notability. —mono 03:09, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, its a shame about the earlier nomination, but this guy lacks coverage to show notability. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 16:01, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability not shown by reliable sources. Astudent0 (talk) 20:28, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.