Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michele G. Wheatly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can be userfied or recreated as suggested by DGG by anybody who wants to rewrite the article. Sandstein 21:53, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Michele G. Wheatly

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is mostly self-promotional and generally lacks third party sources independent of her employers. I don't see anything that clearly establishes why Wheatly is noteworthy. Bitmapped (talk) 04:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Vice-chancellor and provost of university is enough for a start. PamD 09:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 10:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 10:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 10:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 10:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 10:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 10:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The guidelines at WP:PROF indicate that being provost is not sufficient for notability (see notes for Criterion #6). Bitmapped (talk) 16:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. At universities where "vice chancellor" is the highest administrative position at the whole university, it meets #6, but in US universities it is a lower-level administrative position that does not pass that criterion. And all the in-depth coverage of the subject (in our article and what I found doing my own searches) is either on employer web sites or university newspapers, too local and non-secondary to pass WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete being the provost at most American universities is not in and of itself a sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify. and rewrite. This is a press release, but her citation record with over 20 papers having 50 or more citations is impressive enough in invertebrate physiology. DGG ( talk ) 02:56, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.