Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Nickels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:13, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Nickels

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On notability grounds. Mixed martial artist who has not fought in any top tier fights. Other claims of notability are unsourced. Peter Rehse (talk) 11:43, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 11:46, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:22, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:22, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment He actually has two top tier fights both in the UFC but he's still one short from passing WP:NMMA. Into the Rift (talk) 18:12, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do we actually include The Ultimate Fighter as UFC - I was under the impression that it wasn't the same or considered top tier.Peter Rehse (talk) 18:16, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He fought on an Ultimate Fighter Finale event those count as UFC events the fights on the tv show do not count. Into the Rift (talk) 18:30, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Still it does not look like he will make the three top tier.Peter Rehse (talk) 22:28, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't meet WP:NMMA or WP:GNG because he lacks enough top tier fights and significant coverage.204.126.132.231 (talk) 22:25, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with previous comments. He fails WP:NMMA and WP:GNG. Mdtemp (talk) 17:49, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.