Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Richman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:05, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Richman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has only fought for Brutaal, which is a Minnesota-only promotion. Brutaal isn't deemed notable and other fighters who have only fought for them are usually deleted Paralympiakos (talk) 01:08, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:19, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I suspect that this information was deliberately left out of the article -Drdisque (talk) 01:51, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No fights in a major promotion or against notable opponents. No significant coverage on Google. --TreyGeek (talk) 15:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fighter does not meet MMA notability criteria. Astudent0 (talk) 17:52, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Has fought only in low-level events. He's not close to meeting WP:MMANOT, at least not at this time. Papaursa (talk) 03:22, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.