Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moshuh Nanren

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moshuh Nanren

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: The article is in clear copyright violation, lack of verifiability, and could easily be a hoax. Just the term "Moshuh Nanren" (translates to "Magical Pecans") is enough to convince me it's a hoax. I have one of the referenced books, Mind Control which is a fictional book. --RedSwordsman (talk) 20:25, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The original nominator had confused the prod and AfD processes. It has been fixed. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 13:25, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only source for this seems to be a single author's books. I can find no other reliable references. Papaursa (talk) 16:28, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above. No evidence of notability, or even of existance outside of this author's books. Note that a fictional concept can be notable, if it's covered in the proper sources; there's no evidence of that here, however. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 15:32, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.