Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mrs Globe Australia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:02, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mrs Globe Australia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N and WP:V and WP:RS. Most of the "sources" are broken links - did those sources ever exist? Of the real sources, most of them aren't even about Mrs. Australia Globe but just about Mrs. Globe in general. At best, some of the sources can be merged into the Mrs. Globe article but I don't really see that being necessary either. The titleholders tables are also a mess with many missing years and no info on placements or special awards - clearly not notable enough for any sources to speak about those things. Seems like an easy delete to me. DownAndUp (talk) 02:49, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Beauty pageants and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 07:53, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Extensive article in the National newspaper the latin Australian times by award winning journalist Carmen Novoa Australianblackbelt (talk) 09:55, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just translated that picture using https://translate.yandex.com/ocr and the content reads like an ad. It looks like PR, mostly regurgitating marketing content from the Mrs. Globe website. Whether or not Carmen Novoa is an award-winning journalist means nothing, because this article is about the pageant not about the author of 1 article. Also, 1 single article is not enough to make this Wikipedia page worthwhile when most of the other sources are broken or are not meeting necessary criteria to demonstrate notability and thorough coverage. This is still failing WP:N and WP:V and WP:RS. DownAndUp (talk) 16:59, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:51, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:17, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I noted that the rationale used for the recent deletion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mrs. International (pageant) applies in this case as well; the last 4 comments that state "Delete" are relevant here too. DownAndUp (talk) 02:49, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Since this is essentially an event run by a commercial organization, the appropriate guideline is WP:NCORP. [References] focus either on the contestants (past and present) and their "causes" or opinions or is based on PR/Announcements. Most of the references have no "Independent Content" as per WP:ORGIND as the content is provided by affiliated sources and the rest fail WP:CORPDEPTH as trivial content." "Sources provided mainly only reference the organization as existing and mostly talk about whatever contestant they're highlighting. Confirmation that it exists is not notability." DownAndUp (talk) 04:07, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as promotional Andre🚐 05:05, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.