Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mumtaz Khan Akbar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 21:41, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mumtaz Khan Akbar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

His business ventures might be notable but notability is not inherited. No significant coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 04:58, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 05:23, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 05:24, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 05:24, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 05:30, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Notability has been exerted in the article e.g. he was the first governor of the first bank of Azad Kashmir etc. Found significant coverage on him here.1 The article should not be deleted merely because it requires edits to conform to Wikipaedia standards.  sami  talk 08:15, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The link you shared is interested in 'Asian community' so they will cover them and they are online only so we can say they are vanity. Second thing, we need multiple independent sources discussing him in detail that nothing remain WP:OR so this fails WP:GNG. Alternate is we can redirect. Störm (talk) 15:17, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Don't know they have such post [1]. Störm (talk) 09:36, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:09, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.