Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nataša Stanković

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Discussion is tainted by the canvassing and any conclusion based on that is untrustworthy. Instead give it a couple of weeks and relist without the canvass Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:05, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nataša Stanković

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable actress or model or artist, fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:ARTIST, WP:NMODEL while failing WP:BIO. The article consists of non-notable or un-reliable tabloids, portals websites, mere repetitive mirror citations quoting same thing even the titles, hardly any reliable sources discuss the subject of the article, failing WP:BASIC. Interestingly the article consists instagram citation (cit. 2) along with citation 1 which is again images of instagram with quote of engagement to a player which also shows a case of WP:PROMOTION. Drat8sub (talk) 00:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Drat8sub (talk) 00:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Drat8sub (talk) 00:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Drat8sub (talk) 00:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Drat8sub (talk) 00:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Drat8sub (talk) 00:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:: Inviting GiantSnowman, Johnpacklambert, Amkgp, Spiderone, Pharaoh of the Wizards, Theredproject, Jooojay, Eddie891, for reviewing with their valuable insight if interested. Thank you. Drat8sub (talk) 13:34, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:Canvas no invites Atlantic306 (talk) 23:50, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Not canvas, invited them seeing their participation in similar topics, closely related topics or area of expertise and their recent active participation at AfDs. Thank you Drat8sub (talk) 00:14, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely WP:Canvas of editors you expected to vote delete, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:22, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG Spiderone 14:07, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete a case of copyright violation as per WP:COPYVIO 76.1% copied from (https://www.celebritiesdetails.com/natasa-stankovic-height-weight-bra-size-age-biography-family-wiki/) having notice © 2016 - 2020 : Celebritiesdetails : All Rights Reserved. at the end of web-page. See copyvio report ~ Amkgp ✉ 15:04, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've declined the speedy deletion, this appears to be reverse-copyvio (that website's "article" is dated January 2020, but most of the matching text has been in the article since 2019). creffett (talk) 15:56, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Deletea non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:34, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sourcing could be improved, but right now its better than none. Also, I'd argue she passes GNG based on having a top 10 entry in this: Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/December 29, 2019 to January 4, 2020 ; Shows that she is well known and is notavle for her career and partner. DrewieStewie (talk) 20:52, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Please don't mislead. Top 25 report is not a criterion of keeping an article. The article totally fails WP:BIO. The recent popularity is not because she did anything extraordinary but because married a famous cricketer. Tomorrow if my wife becomes President of a country, then a wikipedia article should be made on me too according to your logic. This is not how wikipedia articles are created, please revist the policies. This is totally a promotional article. Drat8sub (talk) 21:02, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon 04:14, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.