Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nayakkar Chenai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:08, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nayakkar Chenai

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One sentence and two links can't ever justify a Wikipedia article. WP:GEOLAND says places in general are notable. I doubt this would've applied. Virtually all mentions outside Wikipedia is copied text. As an aside, Sorry if I did something wrong here, it's my first time doing this. Jenkowelten (talk) 08:30, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: You did nothing wrong at all by following the process. Good job. I agree that this page should be deleted. The village simply isn't notable. Now let's see what others think. Best wishes, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 02:35, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion was created improperly and never transcluded to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion until now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:22, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:12, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:43, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

delete The only real clue to this is the map link which is vague but which does seem to point to a temple of the same name, which doesn't seme to lie in a significant settlement of its own. Mangoe (talk) 13:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.