Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuri Seferi
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. WP:SK#1. Nom withdrawn, no remaining arguments for deletion. j⚛e deckertalk 17:47, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Nuri Seferi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Boxer who fails to meet WP:NBOX.Jakejr (talk) 18:29, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Recently added info is enough to show notability. Jakejr (talk) 05:48, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Jakejr (talk) 18:29, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea why this is up for deletion, Seferi is the current WBO European champion in his weight class and was ranked 5th in the WBO rankings. That should meets the guidelines I believe. (He is in the Jr. heavyweight category http://www.wboboxing.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/WBO-Ranking-as-of-Mar.-2012.xls http://www.wboboxing.com/wp-content/pdf/WBORanking_Feb_2012.pdf (Oltianruci (talk) 04:31, 8 August 2012 (UTC))[reply]
You are right it would but there was no mention of this in the article. Notability needs to be established in the article. If you could modify the article and let us know afterwards then I am sure there will be a consensus to Keep.Peter Rehse (talk) 04:38, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep European champion information has been added.Peter Rehse (talk) 05:16, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Technically, WP:NBOX says he must be ranked in the top 10 by Ring Magazine or have fought for the world title, but this is good enough for me. Jakejr (talk) 05:48, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.