Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleg Tronko

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 19:43, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oleg Tronko

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unclear why he is notable. Written in poor English without proper references. Rathfelder (talk) 14:34, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Ukraine. Rathfelder (talk) 14:34, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete appears to be a poor translation of something. I can't see why he's notable and I get zero sources. Oaktree b (talk) 14:44, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete search including “Олег Тронько” turns up nothing significant and the rambling personal narrative in this article contains no claim of notability. Mccapra (talk) 04:40, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Neither his conversion to Catholicism nor his repentance from a dissolute lifestyle nor anything else in the article is sufficient to make him notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:35, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can't find the sources alluded to in the article, but from context it doesn't appear that they offer much, one appears to have been written by the subject and the other one I was hoping I could find on archive.org but it's not there and given the context of the article's subject I suspect "Truth and the Life" is a translation and not the actual title. But a mention in a single magazine, even if it were significant coverage, is insufficient for WP:GNG that requires multiple reliable sources, so even if we assume the best scenario for that mystery source, it still wouldn't establish notability without at least two more good sources. Of the external links one is not a reliable source in any way and other while dead is interesting but the independence of the source is tenuous and I don't think it shows notability that a religious group published an obituary of one of their converts. There's not even a claim to notability in the article, converting to another faith is not prima facie notable and that's really all there is here. - Aoidh (talk) 20:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.