Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oren Skoog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:01, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oren Skoog

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Significant credits in only Wasting Away and The Motel Life aren't enough to satisfy WP:NACTOR. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:40, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:37, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:37, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:37, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 10:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The nominator argues that two significant credits are not enough to satisfy WP:NACTOR—but, in my opinion, two credits would meet the "multiple roles" requirement. However, to strengthen the case, here are some other NACTOR-worthy roles: Rusty in Transylmania, ~~Danny in Wasting Away,~~ and a main role in the play, Blithe Spirit (https://www.independent.com/2019/10/15/review-blithe-spirit-is-lively-fun/). Dflaw4 (talk) 14:27, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sulfurboy (talk) 14:50, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete It is time we stopped having any article with only IMDb as a source. Get rid of the unsourced rubbish now. This should have been speedy deleted within a month of creation not allowed to exist for 14 years.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:29, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and most likely all three WP:NACTOR criteria. A search on google reveals little but a few trivial mentions such as this. Clearly fails NACTOR #2 and 3; claim to achieving #1 is disputable, but since there appears to be little coverage I would contend that such roles were probably not as significant as claimed... RandomCanadian (talk | contribs) 03:32, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.