Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orisinal morning sunshine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was No consensus/Keep, following rewrite. The Land
Delete, advertising, vanity or plain non notable - FrancisTyers 20:14, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete pn! - FrancisTyers 20:14, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- If it qualified for speedy deletion then there would have been no need to nominate it for AFD. —Quarl (talk) 2005-12-31 02:00Z
- Delete until someone comes up with a good case for this --Liface 20:18, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Many people I know visit this site, however I don't know of any way to justify its notability that's not original research... ~MDD4696 20:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm inclined towards speedy deletion for lack of context given and notability. --IByte 20:27, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The rewritten article looks like it qualifies for WP:CSD A3 (little more than a bunch of external links). --IByte 11:46, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable Atrian 00:00, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable -- Alexa rank of 3,796 [1]; I've actually visited this website before. —Quarl (talk) 2005-12-31 01:50Z
- FrancisTyers, why do you link to the Alexa traffic page of rank 3796 with the phrase "non-notable"? 4000 is quite notable (WP:WEB says anything with rank 10,000 is notable). —Quarl (talk) 2005-12-31 01:55Z
- I've cleaned up the article; it is now a nicely formatted unvain contextual stub. —Quarl (talk) 2005-12-31 01:58Z
I got that from WP:WEB: Having an Alexa ranking of 10,000 or better. :) - FrancisTyers 01:59, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Haha, scrap that, I read it wrong. My apologies. Personally I think it should be deleted anyway, but thats personal feeling not policy. :) - FrancisTyers 02:02, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Quarl. Stifle 13:52, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Being the starter of this article, I think that this article should be kept considering that Orisinal Morning Sunshine has won several significant awards, including the Webby Award and is quite notable perWP:WEB. Also I am not associated whatsoever with Orisinal or Ferry Halim. However, if Wikipedia feels that this article is not worth keeping, I won't be offended.=) It was my first article anyway...thanks for listening to my thoughts. Midnightmoonradiance 23:57, 4 January 2006 (UTC)midnightmoonradiance[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.